NVES Results Revealed: Which Car Brands Face Big Penalties

The Federal Government has released the inaugural performance results for the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), providing the first empirical validation of the policy’s impact on the Australian automotive landscape.

The report, covering the "soft start" period from July 1 to December 31, 2025, reveals that while the industry as a collective entity achieved a net surplus of 15.9 million efficiency units, this aggregate figure masks significant disparities between manufacturers that have successfully banked credits and those facing substantial emissions liabilities.

According to the data released by the NVES Regulator, the credit market is heavily concentrated among a few key players.

BYD emerged as the dominant surplus holder, banking approximately 4.2 million efficiency units.

Toyota, defying earlier predictions of non-compliance, secured the second-highest surplus with nearly 2.9 million units, largely driven by the volume of its hybrid portfolio.

Tesla also performed strongly, accruing over 2.2 million units. Conversely, several legacy manufacturers finished the reporting period in deficit.

Mazda recorded the highest liability of any entity with over 508,000 deficit units, while Nissan accrued a liability of approximately 215,000 units.

While manufacturers are currently racking up "interim" debts, the actual bill isn't due immediately.

Under the NVES rules, brands have until 31 December 2027 to "extinguish" their 2025 debt by either earning new credits through cleaner car sales or buying surplus units from competitors.

If their balance remains above zero by February 2028, the Regulator will issue an official Final Emissions Value (FEV) and a corresponding infringement notice.

For every unit of debt remaining, manufacturers will be charged $50 AUD.

Using the government’s own example, a manufacturer with a 2,000-unit deficit would be hit with a $100,000 fine.

If this remains unpaid, the Regulator can take legal action where penalties can double to $100 per unit.

2025 NVES Performance

‍

‍

These potential penalties are already being baked into the "sticker price" of new cars. Because manufacturers are businesses that must maintain margins, any expected emissions debt is being passed directly to the consumer.

We have already seen this play out with the Y62 Nissan Patrol - which recently copped a $5,000 price hike - with Nissan Australia explicitly citing the introduction of the NVES as a factor behind the increase.

The urgency of this challenge is compounded by the aggressive tightening of emissions targets over the coming years.

The current 2025 headline target for passenger vehicles of 141 grams of CO2 per kilometre is a relatively high baseline.

This target will drop to 117g/km in 2026, before plunging to 58g/km by 2029.

Similarly, the target for Light Commercial Vehicles will tighten from 210g/km today to 110g/km in 2029.

This trajectory creates a compounding problem for brands currently in deficit; they must not only clear their 2025 debt but also meet increasingly stringent targets that will rapidly erode the value of conventional hybrids and non-plug-in technologies.

Market data suggests consumers are already responding to these regulatory shifts.

Despite the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) characterising demand for electric vehicles as "subdued", VFACTS data for January 2026 indicates a significant pivot toward utility-focused low-emission vehicles.

Sales of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) surged by 170.5 per cent year-on-year, driven in large part by the launch of the BYD Shark 6, which recorded 1,108 sales in January alone.

The road to 2029 is set to be a transformative - and potentially expensive - period for the Australian automotive industry.

As targets tighten and credits become the new market currency, the era of the "unregulated" gas-guzzler is officially over.

For manufacturers, the choice is now a matter of survival: pivot rapidly to low-emission technology or prepare to pass even larger compliance costs onto their customers.

For Aussie drivers, the shift is already visible on the showroom floor. Whether it's through a "compliance tax" on traditional V8s or a broader range of high-tech hybrids, the price of staying behind the curve is becoming too much for manufacturers to ignore.